Masterbatch production is one of the critical supply chain links in the plastics industry. Quality consistency in the production of these concentrated mixtures that provide coloring, additives, and functional properties is vital for customer satisfaction and operational efficiency. In this context, First Time Right (FTR) and First Pass Yield (FPY) metrics are among the most important indicators for measuring the effectiveness of production processes.
While it is possible to improve these metrics with traditional approaches, the integration of machine learning (ML) models creates groundbreaking results in masterbatch production. In this article, we will examine in detail how we can increase FTR and FPY metrics throughout the entire production process from raw material input to final product output, and the role of ML models in this process.
FTR indicates the rate at which a product is produced in compliance with specifications on the first production attempt. In masterbatch production, this means color matching, dispersion quality, particle size distribution, and physical properties meeting target values.
FTR Calculation:
FTR = (Number of successful batches on first attempt / Total number of batches produced) × 100
FPY measures the rate of products that meet specifications on the first pass without rework or scrap. In masterbatch production, rework both increases costs and extends production time.
FPY Calculation:
FPY = (Number of batches not requiring rework / Total number of batches produced) × 100
Masterbatch production basically consists of the following stages:
Each stage directly affects the final product quality and plays a critical role in FTR/FPY metrics.
Checking the compliance of incoming raw materials with specifications is fundamental. However, factors such as lot variations between suppliers, storage conditions, and aging effects can lead to inconsistencies.
Traditional Method: Manual sampling and laboratory tests Limitation: Reactive approach, focusing only on a few parameters
Recipe adjustments based on the knowledge of experienced operators are made. This approach is valuable but can be subjective and may not consider all variables.
Parameters such as temperature, pressure, screw speed are aimed to be kept within narrow tolerances. However, the complex interactions of these parameters with each other and with raw material properties are often overlooked.
Process stabilization is attempted with control charts and trend analyses. Although this method is effective, it remains limited in multivariate systems.
ML models go beyond traditional methods by learning hidden patterns from large data sets, modeling multivariate relationships, and making proactive predictions. The impact of ML on FTR/FPY metrics in masterbatch production is evident in four main areas:
Application:
ML Model Types:
FTR/FPY Impact: ML models can raise FTR rates from around 60-70% to 85-95% levels. In a pilot application, 73% of errors due to color mismatch were predicted and prevented before production.
Concrete Example: A masterbatch manufacturer was experiencing 15% quality issues in pigment lots from the supplier. Using 18 months of past data, a Random Forest model learned the relationship between supplier information, lot number, spectroscopic measurements, and production results. The model detected problematic lots with 92% accuracy in advance, allowing them to be processed with separate recipes or rejected.
Application:
ML Model Types:
FTR/FPY Impact: Adaptive recipe optimization can raise FTR from 40-50% to 70-80% levels, especially in new product launches from the first attempt. Additionally, FPY drops due to raw material changes can be reduced by 60%.
Concrete Example: A manufacturer experienced differences in the optical properties of TiO2 pigment due to a supplier change. With the traditional approach, finding the appropriate recipe with the new supplier's material required 12-15 attempts (FTR ~7%). A system using Bayesian Optimization found the optimal recipe in just 3-4 attempts (FTR ~25-33%), providing 85% time savings.
Application:
ML Model Types:
FTR/FPY Impact: Real-time optimization can increase FPY by 15-25% by instantly correcting deviations that may occur during production. Its effect is particularly evident in long-term productions and multi-colored masterbatches.
Concrete Example: An LSTM model monitoring screw temperature, motor current, pressure, and throughput data in the extrusion process was predicting dispersion quality in real time. When the model detected a tendency for dispersion to deteriorate, it automatically adjusted screw speed and barrel temperatures. This system reduced the rework rate due to dispersion issues from 8% to 1.5%.
Application:
ML Model Types:
FTR/FPY Impact: Equipment failures and performance declines have an indirect but significant impact on FTR/FPY. ML-based predictive maintenance can reduce unplanned downtime by 40-60% and decrease equipment-related quality problems by 30-50%.
Concrete Example: A facility set up a system to predict extruder screw wear from vibration sensors and motor current data. The model predicted the time when the screw needed to be replaced 2-3 weeks in advance with 87% accuracy. This reduced faulty batches produced due to worn screws by 78% compared to reactive maintenance.
The highest FTR/FPY improvements come not from isolated ML applications, but from integrated systems. A comprehensive solution includes:
With an integrated ML approach, a medium-sized masterbatch manufacturer (annual capacity of 20,000 tons) can expect the following results:
The use of ML in masterbatch production is rapidly maturing. In the coming years, we will see the following developments:
A virtual replica of the entire production line will enable risk-free testing of different scenarios. Questions like "What if we change this raw material?" or "What if we take this new customer order?" will be answerable in seconds.
Through collective learning without sharing data from different production facilities, stronger models will be developed. Best practices learned in one facility can be instantly transferred to others.
ML models that can explain their recommendations, breaking the "black box" perception, will increase operator trust and meet regulatory requirements.
Lower latency times and higher processing power will take real-time optimization to new levels.
ML models will optimize not only quality and cost, but also carbon footprint, energy efficiency, and circular economy goals.
Increasing FTR and FPY metrics in masterbatch production is critical for operational excellence. While traditional methods provide improvement up to a certain level, the integration of machine learning models creates paradigm-shifting results.
The power of ML lies not only in making better predictions, but in scaling human expertise and creating continuously learning, adaptive systems. At every stage from raw material input to final product output, ML models reduce variations, accelerate optimization, and enable proactive decision-making.
Successful implementation is as much about people, processes, and culture as it is about technology. Investing in data infrastructure, bringing together the right talents, and adopting a phased, pragmatic approach are essential for sustainable improvement.
The masterbatch industry stands on the threshold of digital transformation. Companies that adopt ML early will not only achieve higher FTR/FPY, but also gain competitive advantage, customer satisfaction, and operational flexibility. The future belongs to data-driven, intelligent, and continuously learning production systems.
Explore Corius' solutions for the Chemistry and Manufacturing sectors.
Kızılırmak Mah. Dumlupınar Bulvarı Next Level No:3 A Kat:4 D.No:10 PK:06520 Çankaya / Ankara - Türkiye